Cover of: Conceptual issues in modern human origins research | Read Online
Share

Conceptual issues in modern human origins research

  • 365 Want to read
  • ·
  • 9 Currently reading

Published by Aldine de Gruyter in New York .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Human beings -- Origin,
  • Human evolution -- Research,
  • Human evolution -- Philosophy

Book details:

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references (p. 437-492) and indexes.

StatementG.A. Clark and C.M. Willermet, editors.
SeriesEvolutionary foundations of human behavior
ContributionsClark, Geoffrey A., Willermet, C. M. 1968-
Classifications
LC ClassificationsGN281 .C586 1997
The Physical Object
Paginationxiii, 508 p. :
Number of Pages508
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL994839M
ISBN 100202020398, 0202020401
LC Control Number96033415

Download Conceptual issues in modern human origins research

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Get this from a library! Conceptual issues in modern human origins research. [Geoffrey A Clark; C M Willermet;] -- While those who study human origins now agree that the evolution of modern human form extends back much further in time than the evolution of modern human behavior, they . Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research (Evolutionary Foundations of Human Behavior Series) [C. M. Willermet, G. A. Clark] on hisn-alarum.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. While those who study human origns now agree that the evolution of the modern human form extends back much further in time than originally thought. Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research - Ebook written by Geoffrey A. Clark, Catherine M. Willermet. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research.3/5(1). American Journal of Human Biology. Volume 11, Issue 1. Book Review. Conceptual issues in modern human origins research. Richard G. Klein. Corresponding Author. Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, hisn-alarum.com: Richard G. Klein.

Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research Paperback – Dec 31 by C. M. Willermet (Editor), G. A. Clark (Editor) out of 5 stars 1 customer review. See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions. Amazon Price New from Used from 4/5(1). [Editor, with C. M. Willermet] Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research. xiv + pages. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. [Editor, with M. R. González Morales] The Mesolithic of the Atlantic Façade: Proceedings of the Santander Symposium. Tempe: Arizona State University, Arizona State University Anthropological Research Paper No. Of all published articles, the following were the most read within the past 12 months. Evolutionary Foundations of Human Behavior Series edited by G.A. Clark & C.M. Willermet. While those who study human origins now agree that the evolution of the modern human form extends back much further in time than originally thought, they disagree sharply as to how to interpret the substantive data.

Paradigm crisis in modern human origins research. Book. Full-text available. Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research. January · American Antiquity. Clark, Geoffrey A. and Catherine M. Willermet, Editors () Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter Press. Cole, Joanna () Evolution: The Story of How Life Developed on Earth. New York: HarperTrophy Books. 4. His recent involvement in modern human origins research (numerous articles, two books) has shown that data do not exist independent of the conceptual frameworks that define and contextualize them, and that paleoanthropologists can only ignore the logic of inference at their peril. Download PDF Studying Human Origins book full free. point is that studying the history of palaeoanthropological thinking about the past can enhance the quality of current research on human origins. The main issues in the present volume are the uses of disciplinary history in terms of present-day research concerns, the relative weight of.